Markets.com Logo
euEnglish
LoginSign Up

The US Debt Ceiling: The Only Way Is Up

Sep 30, 2021
6 min read
Table of Contents

    With Democratic lawmakers currently working to pass a multi-trillion dollar infrastructure bill, Republican senators have rediscovered their fiscal conservatism, which appeared to temporarily desert them during the Trump era. Given their minority status in both Congressional chambers, McConnell and co are relying on a tool that served them well under the Obama administration – the debt ceiling.

    Republicans are demanding that Democrats reduce the scale of their planned infrastructure bill, whose price tag could be as high as $3.5 trillion. Without cooperation on that issue, Republican senators say they will refuse to cooperate on the issue of the debt ceiling. With Senate Majority Leader Schumer already ruling out the use of the reconciliation workaround, which allows for a simple majority for a bill to pass, the only path to resolution on this issue is through a normal Senate vote. This is critical, given the 60-vote requirement for regular bills to pass in the Senate – any debt ceiling resolution will require at least 10 red-state senators to break ranks and vote aye. The achievement of 60 votes is made yet more difficult by the potential for moderate Democrats to join their Republican colleagues in blocking action on the debt ceiling, with Joe Manchin having previously expressed his discomfort with the national debt.

    Secretary Yellen now says that the US is likely to hit its debt ceiling on the 18th of October, meaning the federal government will be unable to fulfil its financial obligations after this date unless the ceiling is raised or suspended. This latter point is crucial and has been somewhat muddied by Republican spin on this issue. In reality, the debt ceiling is not about new government spending at all, it is about the government’s ability to fulfil spending promises that it has already made. Such obligations include both welfare payments and the maintenance of the national debt, meaning the potential economic consequences of this saga go far beyond the passage or non-passage of Biden’s infrastructure plan.

    This is not the first time that Republican lawmakers have employed such a strategy, using it in both 2011 and 2013 to extract concessions from President Obama. In both of these cases, the concessions achieved were relatively minor, and the Republicans were eventually forced to settle for a moral victory at best. On top of that, the Democrats were able to avoid the bulk of the political backlash, with only 31% of the country saying that they were to blame for the crisis in 2011. So why use such a tactic again, given that it appears on the surface to have been so unsuccessful in times past?

    • Firstly, the political landscape has shifted drastically since episodes one and two of this trilogy. President Biden is a far less formidable political adversary than his former boss, particularly with regards to charisma and control over the media narrative. McConnell will be betting that his party can do a better job of deflecting blame towards the Democrats now they don’t have to compete with Obama’s overwhelming political celebrity. This strategy already appears to be paying off, with just 16% of poll respondents blaming the Republicans for the potential default.
    • Secondly, let us not forget who the intended audience of this political stunt really is – the Republican base. Having the support of even just 31% of the country is more than enough to achieve success in US elections given their historically low turnout, especially in the midterms which are now on the horizon. Turnout will be key in 2022 and this savvy political ploy will increase Republican chances of breaking the Democratic stranglehold on Washington next year by enticing conservative voters to the polls.

    With all of this being said, the actual probability of US debt default is virtually zero. This Republican routine would be much more convincing if we hadn’t seen it twice before already. Does anyone really believe that it is a coincidence that all three debt crises have come in the year prior to a midterm election? Or that lawmakers (and their donors) with combined stock portfolios in the billions would seriously allow the devastating economic damage such a default would guarantee? The final nail in the coffin for the convincingness of such a threat is the Republican voters themselves. One of the best-kept secrets in Washington is that red states receive far more in net federal spending per capita than blue states. Whilst conservative voters may love the idea of national fiscal responsibility in theory, they are far more attached to personal financial solvency in practice. If the Republicans actually allowed this debacle to get to a point where the government stopped sending welfare checks, it would be their voters who would suffer the most, and the potential political benefits of this gambit would be nowhere to be seen.

    This is not to say that no economic damage will be done or that no panic will occur. In 2011 a resolution was agreed just two days before the debt ceiling was due to be reached and resulted in a US credit rating downgrade and the loss of 1.2 million jobs by 2015. Rather, the very worst fears of the financial markets will not be realised – the debt ceiling will be raised and the infrastructure bill will pass in one form or another. But it’s going to get very messy and very noisy before we get there.

    Outcomes:

    1. The panic and political manoeuvring will continue, and may even stretch beyond the October 18th date stated by Yellen, if the Treasury gets creative with their accounting. This uncertainty will hit markets and the real economy but this is a sacrifice Republicans are willing to make. McConnell looks set to trade a few points in the S&P 500 for a few points at the polls in the midterms – a bit of a bargain in political terms.
    2. Moderate Democrats will use this pressure as leverage against the left in their own party who are pushing for the headline $3.5 trillion bill to be realised. This will lead to further infighting among the Democrats which the left will likely lose, meaning a smaller infrastructure package than initially intended.
    3. The chances of the Democrats maintaining or expanding their control in Washington just went down.

    Risk Warning and Disclaimer: This article represents only the author’s views and is for reference only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial guidance, nor does it represent the stance of the Markets.com platform. Trading Contracts for Difference (CFDs) involves high leverage and significant risks. Before making any trading decisions, we recommend consulting a professional financial advisor to assess your financial situation and risk tolerance. Any trading decisions based on this article are at your own risk.

    Written by
    SHARE

    Markets

    • Palladium - Cash

      chartpng

      --

      0.52%
    • EUR/USD

      chartpng

      --

      0.18%
    • Cotton

      chartpng

      --

      0.66%
    • AUD/USD

      chartpng

      --

      0.55%
    • Santander

      chartpng

      --

      0.74%
    • Apple.svg

      Apple

      chartpng

      --

      -1.77%
    • easyJet

      chartpng

      --

      0.90%
    • VIXX

      chartpng

      --

      -2.09%
    • Silver

      chartpng

      --

      0.01%
    Table of Contents

      Related Articles

      Morning Note: RBA Holds Rates; Trump Tariffs Hit; Tesla Dips on Musk News

      The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) surprised markets on Tuesday by holding its cash rate steady at 3.85%, defying widespread expectations of a rate cut.

      Tommy Yap|about 16 hours ago

      Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures fall, Sensex, Nifty update

      Stock market today: the global stock markets opened the day with a mixed tone as key U.S. futures indices showed declines while Indian benchmarks remained largely unchanged.

      Frances Wang|1 day ago

      Lumber Stocks to Watch: SSD stock, UFPI stock, HD stock

      Lumber Stocks to Watch: the lumber and building materials sector plays a vital role in the construction and home improvement industries.

      Frances Wang|1 day ago
      Markets.com Logo
      google playapp storeweb tradertradingView

      Contact Us

      support@markets.com+12845680155

      Markets

      • Forex
      • Shares
      • Commodities
      • Indices
      • Crypto
      • ETFs
      • Bonds

      Trading

      • Trading Tools
      • Platform
      • Web Platform
      • App
      • TradingView
      • MT4
      • MT5
      • CFD Trading
      • CFD Asset List
      • Trading Info
      • Trading Conditions
      • Trading Hours
      • Trading Calculators
      • Economic Calendar

      Learn

      • News
      • Trading Basics
      • Glossary
      • Webinars
      • Traders' Clinic
      • Education Centre

      About

      • Why markets.com
      • Global Offering
      • Our Group
      • Careers
      • FAQs
      • Legal Pack
      • Safety Online
      • Complaints
      • Contact Support
      • Help Centre
      • Sitemap
      • Cookie Disclosure
      • Regulation
      • Awards and Media

      Promo

      • Gold Festival
      • Crypto Trading
      • marketsClub
      • Welcome Bonus
      • Loyal Bonus
      • Referral Bonus

      Partnership

      • Affiliation
      • IB

      Follow us on

      • Facebook
      • Instagram
      • Twitter
      • Youtube
      • Linkedin
      • Threads
      • Tiktok

      Listed on

      • 2023 Best Trading Platform Middle East - International Business Magazine
      • 2023 Best Trading Conditions Broker - Forexing.com
      • 2023 Most Trusted Forex Broker - Forexing.com
      • 2023 Most Transparent Broker - AllForexBonus.com
      • 2024 Best Broker for Beginners, United Kingdom - Global Brands Magazine
      • 2024 Best MT4 & MT5 Trading Platform Europe - Brands Review Magazine
      • 2024 Top Research and Education Resources Asia - Global Business and Finance Magazine
      • 2024 Leading CFD Broker Africa - Brands Review Magazine
      • 2024 Best Broker For Beginners LATAM - Global Business and Finance Magazine
      • 2024 Best Mobile Trading App MENA - Brands Review Magazine
      • 2024 Best Outstanding Value Brokerage MENA - Global Business and Finance Magazine
      • 2024 Best Broker for Customer Service MENA - Global Business and Finance Magazine
      LegalLegal PackCookie DisclosureSafety Online

      Payment
      Methods

      mastercardvisanetellerskrillwire transferzotapay
      The markets.com/za/ site is operated by Markets South Africa (Pty) Ltd which is a regulated by the FSCA under license no. 46860 and licensed to operate as an Over The Counter Derivatives Provider (ODP) in terms of the Financial Markets Act no.19 of 2012. Markets South Africa (Pty) Ltd is located at BOUNDARY PLACE 18 RIVONIA ROAD, ILLOVO SANDTON, JOHANNESBURG, GAUTENG, 2196, South Africa. 

      High Risk Investment Warning: Trading Foreign Exchange (Forex) and Contracts For Difference (CFDs) is highly speculative, carries a high level of risk and is not appropriate for every investor. You may sustain a loss of some or all of your invested capital, therefore, you should not speculate with capital that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with trading on margin. Please read the full  Risk Disclosure Statement which gives you a more detailed explanation of the risks involved.

      For privacy and data protection related complaints please contact us at privacy@markets.com. Please read our PRIVACY POLICY STATEMENT for more information on handling of personal data.

      Markets.com operates through the following subsidiaries:

      Safecap Investments Limited, which is regulated by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (“CySEC”) under license no. 092/08. Safecap is incorporated in the Republic of Cyprus under company number ΗΕ186196.

      Finalto International Limited is registered  in the Saint Vincent and The Grenadines (“SVG”) under the revised Laws of Saint Vincent and The Grenadines 2009, with registration number  27030 BC 2023.

      Close
      Close

      set cookie

      set cookie

      We use cookies to do things like offer live chat support and show you content we think you’ll be interested in. If you’re happy with the use of cookies by markets.com, click accept.